It is a very bare-bone, minimalist desktop environment. Here, for example, you can see the settings categories. Let’s start with XFCE. Jawaban 1: Saya adalah pengguna windows. Posted by 2 years ago. In fact, the Linux Mint community is continuously debating on which desktop environment is the best. XFCE is a delight in many ways, when compared with Cinnamon: Less memory and processor utilization; A bit more stable (though this could be an instability with Nemo) Faster/easier to configure (the settings menus are much better organized with fewer top-level items) Cinnamon Superiority XFCE runs blazing fast on my desktop, so if speed is an issue, XFCE all the way. I would like to switch to Cinnamon. It is minimal and to the point. Close. XFCE Superiority. I switched from Ubuntu to Linux Mint Cinnamon and it feels pretty slick and stable. I have an old HP Stream that I want to put Linux on. Out of these three, Cinnamon and MATE are the most popular and widely recommended options. It reminds me very much of Linux distros of years past. The window style is sharp and quite plain but also modern. XFCE vs Cinnamon. A DE is essentially what is used for the graphic mode of Linux. Like Mate, Xfce is primarily for older hardware which many have issues with the demands of Cinnamon. Posted on June 8, 2012 by totallyfactual. cinnamon vs mate vs kde vs xfce. 4. The default I am running now is XFCE. Linux Mint Xfce: This is by far the most stable and lightweight option. Archived. Cinnamon Default Look. I probably clicked every item under Settings, and still haven't found it yet. Discussion. The look of the apps is sleek and indicate that they are aiming for productivity. I used Mate and xfce for a couple of days (with load averages of just .1 -.3 )and went back to cinnamon. Beberapa tahun yang lalu saya membuat spreadsheet yang … Cinnamon vs Mate vs Xfce. XFCE and Cinnamon are both familiar and popular desktop environment (DE) in Linux. I have no real cons when using cinnamon. Discussion. Cinnamon has many themes, runs reasonably fast, and generally has a nice interface. cinnamon vs mate vs kde vs xfce. I'm leaning toward Mate on it. I have spent a day Googling on "switch XFCE to Cinnamon", but haven't read anything useful. It is fast, easy, and simple. It has Windows and is so insanely slow I want to toss it through a window. I normally use Cinnamon for both (Linux Mint (3 systems) and Ubuntu ZFS (1 sys), but last week the CPU load averages peaked at 100% on my 4 linux boxes with the offending program was cinnamon –replace. However, it does NOT come with several key packages built-in that I think many new users would expect. Cinnamon vs Mate vs Xfce. Quite frankly, now it resembles Xfce much more in terms of looks. XFCE Has a simmilar interface, is somewhat-easily customizeable (in my current experience) and also has an appealing interface. The number of users by edition is shown below :- * Xfce : Uses gtk, traditional layout by default but highly customizable, very lightweight. I am sure there is an easy way to do this. Cinnamon can be added to much any distro, though have never tried with Xfce, on the other hand, unless one has nothing except time on their hands, experiment away & see which is the best. Saya mencoba menemukan Lingkungan Desktop yang terlihat dan bertindak seperti windows.
2020 cinnamon vs xfce