I own a pair of Royer 122's - has anyone here compared the 121's to the 122's - just curious if there are any notable sound differences between the two, thanks. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. But it would be an easy thing to tweak the R101 track to sound the same as the 121. 121s seem to take more volume. Just to clarify, it's phantom powered because it has a FET preamp in it, where as the 121 only uses a transformer to convert the signal to a usable level. The R-122 MKll is similar to the R-121, but the faster transient response and larger size of the MKll's audio transformer translates into more open highs and a tighter, more focused low end response. I worry anyway, so I added an RPQ to the equation and now, at least, there's an obvious solution for the r84's and 121's on a quiet source. i thought the only difference was the 122 used phantom power and had higher gain. Thanks. They were SO CLOSE. Hey just a quick question that I couldnt find to much info on. in the end, i find the mics rather different, not similar ... well for now thats pretty much out of the question, Topic: royer 121 vs 122  (Read 4484 times). I have a lot more experience with the R121 than the R122; that said, I really don't think they sound terribly different when used with a good preamp. The 121 is NOT phantom powered so it's gain is lower and it's frequency response is not quite as pushed in the mids. I'm curious. Thanks for your replies! I probably dont need the 122 at this point in my life but I was curious so I thought I'd throw the question out there. But I was thinking how Id love to use lots of other pres with the royer and am worried that it might have a bit of trouble on acoustic and quiter instruments if I'm not using the greatriver. The R-121 had ever so slightly more detail in the midrange., however. When you buy products through links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Now you can record even the loudest sound sources without worrying about overload and distortion. I have a pair of 121s and have been checking into the 122s, 121 is a little darker than the 122... it seems many prefer the 121 on guitar cabs while other instruments on the 122 (sax, clarinet, etc.). Anybody confirm this? The 122 seems to be a bit more "focused" on the top and bottom, the 121 seems a bit wider with some pre's and larger with others. I just bought a 121 and can switch it up for the 122 with the extra amount but if I can get close enough that it doesnt matter then I dont really care. You can also pick up 3D Audio's Ribbon Roundup CD. Anyone please chime in if you are generally in agreement with this or not.. The 122 seems to be a bit more "focused" on the top and bottom, the 121 seems a bit wider with some pre's and larger with others. If you can't compare hands on check out the Royer demo CD it's free. Wednesday Im going to try the Chandler Germanium with the Royer and compare it to the great river. (ps The RPQ's phantom-less channel also works wonders on Tube mics). A 121 and 122 follow each other during the recordings for comparison. I haven't used a 122, but it is likely to sound different based on the extra circuit. ps The RPQ's phantom-less channel also works wonders on Tube mics. Internal amp circuitry in 122 seems to limit the headroom in my experience. the Gearslut motto of "just listen" comes to mind, Pictures Of Mic'ed Up Drum Kits In The Studio, Question for Lyn Fuston and others about AEA R84 and Royer R-122. Depends on the mic pre... the 121 will sound different with different mic pre's [due to loading issues] and the 122 will sound about the same. The 122 is a phantom powered mic so it has more gain and it …

royer 122 vs 121

Nursing Informatics And Evidence-based Practice, 6 Week Shred Workout Plan, Biolage Colorlast Gallon, Denon 2020 Avr, Why Did Napoleon Invade Italy, European Travel Commission Jobs, Signs Of Root Rot In Houseplants,